Benefit Ass'n International, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
This case concerns what “minimum contacts” are needed for in personam jurisdiction over an insurer that sells “medical benefits” policies to foreigners traveling in California. A Venezuelan insured has filed an action in California against two Mississippi companies. Neither the insurance company issuing the policy, which has offices in Jackson, Mississippi and Miami, Florida, nor its servicing agent, whose only office is in Mississippi, conducts business in California. The suit is over a contract for medical insurance obtained through Venezuelan representatives of a Turks…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Vernon and Bonnie Rambo v. American Southern Insurance Company, Mid South Claim Services, Inc., and W.T.R., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS, AG v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Tri-West Insurance Services, Inc. v. Seguros Monterrey Aetna, S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Intershop Communications Ag v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002