Legal Opinion

Jacques v. Gould

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 21, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, J.

The plaintiff, husband of the defendant’s daughter, seeks to recover in one count for board, and in the other for lodging, furnished the defendant. There was a finding for the defendant. The report contains all the evidence material to the issues reported.

The plaintiff, who filed no requests for rulings, claims to. be aggrieved by the allowance of a motion, made by the defendant and the giving of five rulings requested by him.

The motion was “that judgment may be entered for the defendant for that the.plaintiff has not proved any contract under which judgment may be entered for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Lennon v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API