Legal Opinion

KSQHG, Inc. v. Geiserman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1996No. 96-1617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHAHOOD, Judge.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of the trial court’s order granting discovery of tax returns and interrogatories seeking other financial information. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse the wide discretion afforded it in matters of discovery, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Respondent, plaintiff below, sued petitioners, defendant below, in an amended ten count complaint for declaratory relief, imposition of constructive trust, accounting, damages for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, *1191conversion, breach of oral agreement, inter-pleader, derivative…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Charles Sales Corp. v. RovengerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Kodekey Electronics, Inc. v. The Mechanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. Adams v. Citizens Bank of BrevardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & GreavesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golub v. CohenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API