Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Rodriquez

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 30, 1981No. NMCM 80 0941Published

1ConcurrenceBaum, Senior Judge

In the years since United States v. Neal, 3 M.J. 593 (N.C.M.R.1977), there has been considerable development in the law with respect to the responsibility of military judges to ensure that pretrial agreements reflect all the terms agreed upon, are in accord with the law and public policy, are not fundamentally unfair and are fully understood by all parties. See United States v. King, 3 M.J. 458 (C.M.A.1977); United States v. Hoaglin, 10 M.J. 769 (N.C.M.R.1981) and the cases cited therein; United States v. Williamson, 4 M.J. 708 (N.C.M.R.1977). The military judge in this case, LCDR David…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. HoaglinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. NealU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API