Legal Opinion

People of Michigan v. Nicholas James Patton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2018No. 341105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

*904 *428 Defendant appeals by leave granted the trial court's order denying his motion to dismiss two counts of violating the Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA), MCL 28.721 et seq. , on the basis that MCL 28.727(1)(h) (requiring reporting "[a]ll telephone numbers registered to the individual or routinely used by the individual"), and MCL 28.727(1)(i) (requiring reporting "[a]ll electronic mail addresses and instant message addresses assigned to the individual or routinely used by the individual"), are unconstitutionally vague. Following a preliminary examination, defendant was bound over for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Chippewa, County ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
  2. People of Michigan v. Antwan Tamon MimsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. People of Michigan v. Bradly Thomas PetersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. People of Michigan v. Cody Lawrence WillettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. People of Michigan v. David Lamont CroskeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API