Legal Opinion

Clarence Ernest Campbell, III v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1970No. 28467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the motion of a federal convict to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm. 1

Appellant was convicted on his plea of oruilty to an indictment charging him with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(c), possession of money stolen from a bank, the amount stolen being in excess of one hundred dollars. He was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on April 12, 1968.

In his motion to vacate sentence, appellant complains that his plea of guilty was coerced and that his sentence was in excess of the maximum set by the statute. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward K. Devlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. McKenzieDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Donald M. Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Deandre Dre RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API