Donald M. Ingram v. United States

We have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Huth v. Southern Pac. Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I; and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; 5th Cir. R. 18.

This appeal is from an order of the district court denying without an evi-dentiary hearing a motion to vacate sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

August 27, 1962, Donald M. Ingram, defendant-appellant, was…