Legal Opinion

State v. Flowers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2004No. 02-364PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellant Kevin Flowers was convicted of one count of burglary, one count of theft and two counts of violating privacy in communications in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County. Kevin appeals. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it allowed Lieutenant Neuman to remain in the courtroom after the other witnesses had been excluded?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it admitted evidence of Kevin’s actions at Jerry Croskrey’s residence?

¶5 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it admitted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DetonancourMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. OttwellMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. PeplowMontana Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Faulconbridge v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Billings v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. NovakMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KearneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API