State v. Zueger
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
The Respondent, Cesia Ann Zueger (Zueger), filed a motion to suppress evidence, which was premised on an alleged procedural defect in a telephonic warrant under Idaho Code section 19-4406. The district judge granted the motion, concluding that a prosecuting attorney is not a peace officer and, therefore, under the statute, the prosecuting attorney has no authority to sign a warrant on the judge’s behalf and such a warrant is invalid. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court, although on different grounds, and this Court granted review.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FeesIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Alesha Ann GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. PrussIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Rosenkrantz v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- State v. Alesha Ann GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.