Legal Opinion

State v. Zueger

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2006No. 31761, 33071PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

The Respondent, Cesia Ann Zueger (Zueger), filed a motion to suppress evidence, which was premised on an alleged procedural defect in a telephonic warrant under Idaho Code section 19-4406. The district judge granted the motion, concluding that a prosecuting attorney is not a peace officer and, therefore, under the statute, the prosecuting attorney has no authority to sign a warrant on the judge’s behalf and such a warrant is invalid. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court, although on different grounds, and this Court granted review.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. FeesIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Leotis B. Branigh, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Alesha Ann GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. PrussIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rosenkrantz v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  5. State v. Alesha Ann GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API