Legal Opinion

Stein v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1937No. 18665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is theft by bailee; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

It was alleged in the indictment, among other things, that appellant possessed the property in question by virtue of a contract of bailment with R. D. Coley. Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that it failed to allege “the kind or character of bailment or contract.” In Collins v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 388, we held in an embezzlement case that the description of the accused in the indictment as bailee was sufficient. See also Dowdy v. State, 64 S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langford v. NevinTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Malz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Fulcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. Great National LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API