Legal Opinion
Sinnett v. J. R. Watkins Company
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 20, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clay
Affirming.
The J. R. Watkins Company, a Minnesota corporation, brought this action against J. L. Sinnett, and Yal C. Norris, E. K. Smith and I. B. Ware, who guaranteed the payment thereof, to recover a balance due for certain medicinal preparations and other articles alleged to have been purchased by Sinnett. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Sinnett and Norris have appealed.
The principal defense was and is that the contract was void because appellee was engaged in doing business in this state without having complied with section 571, Kentucky Statutes,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Galbraith v. Shores-Mueller Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Commonwealth v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Bayer Steam Soot Blower Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Barnes v. Maxwell Motor Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HarperWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Smither v. J. R. Watkins CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ThoroughmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928