Legal Opinion · Dissent

Villarreal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 12, 1985No. 13-84-018-CRPublished

1DissentSeerden, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The threshold question as to the validity of the search of appellant’s vehicle is whether the State met its burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the impoundment of the vehicle was lawful. Ward v. State, 659 S.W.2d 643 (Tex.Crim.App.1983)(en banc); Benavides v. State, 600 S.W.2d 809 (Tex.Crim.*306App.1980); Daniels v. State, 600 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Both the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Art. 1, § 9 of the Texas Constitution provide that people shall be secure in their persons and possessions against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Ben…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Benavides v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Gauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API