Gauldin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MeCORMICK, Judge.
This case is before us on appellant’s petition for discretionary review. A jury found appellant guilty of robbery and after answering true to the enhancement paragraphs assessed punishment at life. In a published opinion, the Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirmed, overruling appellant’s contentions that statements made by him during custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings were erroneously admitted at trial and that the search of his pickup truck was illegal. Gauldin v. State, 632 S.W.2d 652 (Tex.App. — Ft. Worth,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.