Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1957No. 19854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

Under the allegations of the petition, the plaintiff seeks relief against the defendants by virtue of the express contract sued upon, and if under the terms of that contract he is not entitled to a judgment against the defendants, then he is not entitled to any of the other relief for which he prays. As to payment under the contract, it is provided therein as follows: “Article IV. The owner shall make payments on account of the contract as. provided herein, as follows: (1) On completion of phase one (1) the sum of $1,700 based on the contract price of labor and materials…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Leverone v. ArancioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Buttrick Lumber Co. v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Simmons v. Ocean CausewayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Witherell v. LaskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finn v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Scott v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Scott v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. I. Perlis & Sons v. Peacock Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Piedmont Engineering & Construction Corp. v. Amps Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API