Legal Opinion · Dissent

All Purpose Finance Corp. v. D'Andrea

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1967No. Appeal, 58Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Bobeets:

“May individual sureties to a usurious loan made to a corporation raise the defense of usury where the *347corporation itself is precluded from raising the defense of usury?” As the majority views this case, that is the issue confronting the Court today. I, too, would so style the issue were it not for the fact that I strongly believe the time has come to eliminate the distinction between primary obligors and accommodation parties for purposes of determining which individuals may raise the defense of usury. As I view the statutes prohibiting the charging…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gelber v. Kugel's Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Brierley v. Commercial Credit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Moll v. LaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Simpson v. Penn Discount Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Richman v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API