Legal Opinion

Moll v. Lafferty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1930No. Appeal, 330PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This was a scire facias sur judgment wherein the lower court correctly entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. To secure a loan, Charles J. Lafferty, the defendant, in October, 1916, gave the legal plaintiff, Reuben B. Moll, a judgment bond and mortgage in the penal sum of $28,800, to secure the payment of $14,400, payable at the expiration of thirty days after the death of the survivor of Charles H. Lafferty and Rose E. Lafferty, “together with interest thereon, payable at the time of the payment of the principal at the rate of six per…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dowling v. McGregorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Earnest v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. O'Connor v. FlickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Campbell v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Chamberlain v. M'ClurgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Penn Discount Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. First National Bank and Tr. Co. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Richman v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. State Loan Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API