Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Express Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Galveston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1928No. 9153Published

1Dissent

I feel constrained to enter my dissent from the action of the majority in reversing the judgment of the trial court.

In presenting my reasons for dissenting, I shall first discuss the question as to whether the instruments involved are negotiable, and, second, as to whether the bank obtained them in due course.

The instruments which came into the possession of the bank came into its possession as an innocent purchaser for value. I think it clearly apparent that the express company intended that the instruments should be sold and delivered to purchasers by its trustee, and become negotiable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. S. S. Allen Grocery Co. v. Bank of Buchanan CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Close v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Snodgrass v. SweetserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API