Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Sweetser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1896No. 2,068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action was commenced by the appellees, against the appellant, Florence B. Snodgrass, to recover an alleged balance due upon an account. The pleadings were a complaint and an answer thereto of general denial, and a cross-complaint and an answer thereto in four paragraphs, as follows: First, a general denial; second, payment; third, settlement; and fourth, set-off. To the affirmative answers to the cross-complaint there was a reply of general denial.

*683The cause was tried by the court, and a special finding of facts made, with conclusions of law thereon. The only question urged on this appeal…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. S. S. Allen Grocery Co. v. Bank of Buchanan CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Martin v. First National Bank in St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Commercial & Savings Bank Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Spokane Valley Growers' UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API