Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1936No. 25857PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

At some point during the progress of the case the issue made by the petition must have been abandoned and a new issue injected into the case in some way. The petition directly avers that Colby died as a result of the injuries received by him on June 21, 1929, in the course of his employment. No claim is made in the petition that the injury accelerated an existing condition, to wit, cirrhosis of the liver. It pleads unequivocally that the injury caused the death.

It is an old rule that the evidence must correspond to the pleadings and be confined to the point in issue. The theory of. recovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. C. E. Peterson & Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Springfield District Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lawrence Ice Cream Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. West Side Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schell v. Globe Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hamilton v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Cassens Transport Co. v. BohlOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Price v. DaughertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Cummings v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API