Legal Opinion

Buck v. City of Tulsa

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 2023No. 4:21-cv-00295Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SHEILA BUCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-CV-0295-CVE-SH ) C. J. RHOADES, in his individual capacity, ) M.C. PARKER, in his individual capacity, and ) CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court are the following motions: Defendants C.J. Rhoades’ and M.C. Parker’s Combined Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 112); Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Her Claims against Defendants Parker and Rhoades and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 114); Defendants’…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API