Legal Opinion
Bituminous Casualty v. Advanced
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 23, 1996No. 94-9278Published
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-9278. BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Appellant, v. ADVANCED ADHESIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellee, Georgia Pad, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Jan. 23, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (No. 4:94-CV-010-HLM), Harold L. Murphy, Judge. Before HATCHETT, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges. HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: Following Georgia law in this diversity case, we hold that a pollution exclusion provision in a commercial liability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Alley v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Perkins Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.