Curtis Pearman v. Andrew Alexander Szakaly (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any May 15 2019, 8:39 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis Pearman Crystal G. Rowe Naples, Florida New Albany, Indiana Michael E. Brown Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Curtis Pearman, May 15, 2019 Appellant-Counterclaim Plaintiff, Court of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- James C. Purcell v. Old National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Dennis Larson, Rose Real Estate, Inc., and Diversified Commercial Real Estate v. Peter N. KaraganIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Price v. KuchaesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.