Legal Opinion

Dimmick v. Utah Fuel Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1917No. 2973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seventh District; Hon. A. H. Christensen, Judge. Action by Albert Dimmick against the Utah Fuel Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants separately appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages against the' defendants for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while employed as a stationary engineer at the coal mine of the defendant Utah Fuel Company at Castle Grate, Carbon county, Utah.. Briefly stated, the complaint alleges the corporate existence of the defendant Utah Fuel Company; that the defendant Edwards was its outside foreman; that on the 22d day of July, 1913, and for a long time prior thereto, the defendant corporation maintained and operated at its mine tipple at Castle Gate three shaker chutes for sizing coal;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Hill ex rel. Hill v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Shepherd v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Vota v. Ohio Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Clark v. DucheneauUtah Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Picino v. Utah-Apex Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Taylor v. Bamberger Electric R.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Taylor v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API