Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1912No. 2374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from) District Court, Third District; Hon. George G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Joseph Q-. Shepherd against the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries which appellant alleged he suffered1, while engaged *471in the discharge of his duties as a servant of respondent, through its negligence in operating a certain locomotive engine. Respondent denied: that it was guilty of negligence, pleaded contributory negligence, assumed risk, and further insisted at the trial that, under the evidence, the injury to appellant was caused through the negligence of a fellow servant. The court submitted! the case to the jury upon the foregoing defenses, and they returned a-general verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Meyers v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Neesley v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grow v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. AnselmoUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. DeweyUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Vota v. Ohio Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API