Legal Opinion

Arndt v. Ball

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 65, Calendar 46,368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKellt, J.

This appeal involves the title to 120 acres of land located in Missaukee county, and this is the second time this case has been before this Court.

The present appellees (heirs of Mary E. Arndt), in December of 1951, appealed from a decision of the lower court dismissing their bill to quiet title, before proofs were taken in the case. The trial court concluded that the bill of complaint disclosed that the present appellants claimed possession of the land under paramount title, and, therefore, a chancery court was without authority or jurisdiction to determine the issue of title, relying upon CL…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arndt v. BallMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API