Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Tasker

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1988No. Appeal 1453 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

The City of Philadelphia (City) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County dismissing its motion for post-trial relief for failure to file its brief in support of those motions within the time period prescribed by a local rule of court.

Katherine Tasker (appellee) instituted an action against the City to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she tripped on a walkway while walking through Overington Park. A jury trial before the Honorable Charles P. Mirarchi, Jr. was subsequently held on the matter. The jury returned a verdict in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Berkowitz v. Mayflower Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. WEIMAN BY TRAHEY v. PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Jackson v. HendrickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Schulz v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Weinhold v. Brecknock Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. City of Philadelphia v. AFSCME, District Council 47Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API