Ford v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BUMGARDNER, Judge.
Angelo Ford was convicted of grand larceny during a bench trial. The appellant contends the court erred by denying his motion to suppress because: (1) the stop was invalid; (2) the appellant was subjected to custodial interrogation without *253being given Miranda warnings; and (3) the show-up was unduly suggestive. In addition, the appellant alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
The evidence at the appellant’s trial proved that, on November 27, 1995,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Blevins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Royal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Cary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.