Legal Opinion

Dearing v. Wright

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1983No. C-1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from an order denying Paul Dearing, appellant, a temporary injunction to bar his prosecution for possession of marijuana. In denying the injunction, the trial court held that the 1981 amendments to the Texas Controlled Substances Act, article 4476-151 are constitutional. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Dearing is under indictment for possession of marijuana. He initiated this proceeding by filing a petition for injunction against William C. Wright, County Attorney for Orange County, to enjoin his criminal prosecution on the grounds that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Crouch v. CraikTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. LogueTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Crisp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Amusement & Music Operators of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Raymond Wayne Hill v. The City of Houston, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Dallas County District Attorney v. Doe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API