Legal Opinion
Breeden v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 8, 2011No. 10-7073, 10-7078PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Mary Breeden (Breeden) sued her former- employer Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis) alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Novartis on Breeden’s interference claim and entered a judgment as a matter of law on her retaliation claim. Breeden appeals both the summary judgment and the judgment as a matter of law. Novartis conditionally cross-appeals the district court’s mixed-motive jury…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Guile v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Ginger v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Colburn v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Earle v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Ronald Byers v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Kapche v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Buie v. BerrienDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.