Hazuka v. Maryland Casualty Company
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an action to recover a loss alleged to have occurred under the provisions of a safe burglary policy of insurance. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs for $2,000, the maximum liability assumed by the insurer. The defendant has appealed.
The plaintiffs were the owners and operators of a tavern in Omaha known as Hazuka’s Friendly Comer. During the early morning of August 11, 1964, the plaintiff, Godfrey Hazuka, testified that he closed the tavern, placed money in excess of $2,000 in a safe in his basement, threw the, bolt to a closed position, and turned the combination on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Inglis v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Swanson, Inc. v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Grayson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Prothro v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swedberg v. Battle Creek Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Lumbard v. WESTERN FIRE INS. CO., FORT SCOTTNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Lichtentag v. Millers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of TexasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Cochran v. MFA Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.