Legal Opinion

United States v. Dedrick

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 17, 2012No. Criminal Action No. 10-10394-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

YOUNG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Assumptions ought not be drawn where not necessary. This is the essence of the Ockham’s razor; when the simplest explanation seems correct, complex theories ought not be postulated without necessity (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem).

This is a motion to suppress evidence, where the defendant wants the Court to speculate as to alternative theories concerning where he stored the drugs sold in two controlled buys occurring in the hallway outside his apartment. This Court is bound to analyze the facts in a commonsense rather than a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smoak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  2. United States v. Moore-BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API