United States v. Moore-Bush
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Casual observations of a person's forays in and out of her home do not usually fall within the Fourth Amendment's protections. Here, the defendants ask the Court to consider whether a precise video log of the whole of their travels in and out of their home over the course of eight months, created by a camera affixed to a utility pole that could also read the license plates of their guests, raises Fourth Amendment concerns. After a thorough analysis of the parties' arguments and recent Supreme Court authority, the Court rules that it does.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Moore-BushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- v. TafoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020