Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore-Bush

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 3, 2019No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:18-30001-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Casual observations of a person's forays in and out of her home do not usually fall within the Fourth Amendment's protections. Here, the defendants ask the Court to consider whether a precise video log of the whole of their travels in and out of their home over the course of eight months, created by a camera affixed to a utility pole that could also read the license plates of their guests, raises Fourth Amendment concerns. After a thorough analysis of the parties' arguments and recent Supreme Court authority, the Court rules that it does.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Moore-BushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  2. v. TafoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API