Legal Opinion
Lehmann v. Harner
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 5, 1962No. Civ. No. 13168PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a request under Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that defendants admit: “That the accident of August 20, 1960 which occurred at approximately 7:00 P.M. in Towson, Maryland, involving Karl E. Lehmann, Elriede (sic) Lehmann, Elke Lehmann, Rudiger Lehmann and Uwe Lehmann, was caused solely by the negligence of Ernest Luke Harner.”
Defendants have objected to the request for admission on the grounds that it calls for a conclusion on one of the ultimate issues in the case and does not seek admission of a matter of fact but a conclusion of mixed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Demmert v. DemmertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- People of California v. The Steamship Jules FribourgDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Driver v. Gindy Manufacturing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Alaska Credit Bureau of Juneau v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- FMC Corp. v. Daybrook-Ottawa Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966