AMPHENOL CORPORATION v. General Time Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought tljis action under 35 U.S.C. § 281, seeking money damages and injunctive relief against defendant’s alleged infringement of plaintiff’s United States Patent No. 3,137,122. This court has jurisdiction over the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). From the evidence presented at a bench trial of the instant action, we conclude that the patent in suit was invalid and therefore not infringed.
Both plaintiff (Borg) and defendant (G-T) manufacture electric automobile clocks which they sell to automobile manufacturers. The automobile clocks dealt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- James C. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company and William Powell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Koehring Company v. National Automatic Tool Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ropat Corp. v. West Bend Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Ropat Corporation v. West Bend CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Lodge & Shipley Co. v. Holstein & KappertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970