Legal Opinion

AMPHENOL CORPORATION v. General Time Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 31, 1967No. 66 C 218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought tljis action under 35 U.S.C. § 281, seeking money damages and injunctive relief against defendant’s alleged infringement of plaintiff’s United States Patent No. 3,137,122. This court has jurisdiction over the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). From the evidence presented at a bench trial of the instant action, we conclude that the patent in suit was invalid and therefore not infringed.

Both plaintiff (Borg) and defendant (G-T) manufacture electric automobile clocks which they sell to automobile manufacturers. The automobile clocks dealt…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. James C. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company and William Powell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Koehring Company v. National Automatic Tool Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ropat Corp. v. West Bend Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  2. Ropat Corporation v. West Bend CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  3. Lodge & Shipley Co. v. Holstein & KappertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API