Dos Santos v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. District
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THIRD PARTY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration (doc. # 99) filed by third-party defendant Helisul Taxi Aero, LTDA (“Helisul”), as well as Helisul’s Amended Motion for Reconsideration (doc. # 102). After review, the Court concludes that Helisul has consented to jurisdiction for all of Bell’s claims against it. The Court further concludes that it has specific jurisdiction over Helisul. As a result, the Court will deny both motions.
I. Background
As described in the Court’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dallas County v. MERSCORP, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Franlink v. BACE ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Contango Operators, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. v. MilkenDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.