Legal Opinion
Martha Carlson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2017No. 15-2440PublishedCited by 322 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Thacker wrote the opinion, in which Judge Duncan and Judge Keenan joined.
THACKER, Circuit Judge:
After her doctor prescribed and implanted a transvaginal mesh product that Boston Scientific Corporation (“Appellee”) manufactured, Martha Carlson (“Appellant”) sued the company, alleging that the mesh injured her and that Appellee failed to warn of risks associated with the mesh. After joining a Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL”) with respect to alleged risks involving transvaginal mesh products, Appellant lost her failure to warn claim at summary judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- American Canoe Ass'n v. Murphy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- TFWS, Inc. v. FranchotCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Official Committee Of The Unsecured Creditors Of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LlpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Elouise Cobell v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by322 opinions
- Haritha Nadendla v. WakeMedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- U.S. Tobacco Cooperative Inc. v. Big South Wholesale of VA IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Jeffery Moore v. Equitrans, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Daniel Phoenix v. Mark AmonetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
317 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.