Commonwealth v. Feagley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order accepting appellant into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program and setting forth the terms and conditions of that acceptance.
The question before us is whether the trial court can impose a mandatory twelve-month license suspension as a condition of acceptance into the ARD program when 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(e)(6)(ii) specifically grants discretion to impose a license suspension for a period of less than twelve months. We quash the appeal.
Before doing so, however, we must direct our attention to resolving a procedural irregularity in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. LobiondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. GetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.