Legal Opinion

Homan v. Franklin County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 1, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wright District Court. — Hon. J. L. Stevens, Judge. Action for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtG-bangeb, C. J.

I. On the twelfth day of June, 1890, one of the bridges of defendant county, while plaintiff was passing over it, gave way, and fell to the stream below, in consequence of which the plaintiff was seriously injured; and this action is to recover damages thereby sustained. The following is a part of plaintiff’s testimony: “I drove over that bridge a good many times during the year. I observed its condition as shaky. I noticed the bridge. It would shake —oscillate—when you passed over it. It did that morning. There was nothing stuck up to warn me from passing over it. Never saw anything of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkhill v. Town of BrightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Walker v. Decatur CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Incorporated Town of CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Mitchell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Danner v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Worez v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Martin v. ShannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API