Daniman v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtF. E. Johnson, J.
In these two proceedings under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, some of the petitioners were dismissed by the board of higher education and the others by the board of education of the city of New York, but the grounds upon which all the dismissals took place are so similar that the proceedings have been heard together, and should be decided together.
There is very little, if any, dispute of fact, and the differences of opinion are almost altogether on the law; they arise partly because of the difference of view as to the status that these teachers had in relation to the City of New York.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by9 opinions
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Shlakman v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Shlakman v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Daniman v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.