Legal Opinion
Regatos v. North Fork Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 2003No. 02 Civ. 1068(SAS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Tomaz Mendes Regatos, a citizen of Brazil, is suing the Commercial Bank of New York 1 and North Fork Bank as its successor-in-interest 2 (collectively, “CBNY” or the “Bank”), seeking reimbursement in the amount of $600,000 for two allegedly unauthorized wire transfers out of his account. The Bank now moves for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, claiming that Regatos is estopped from seeking reimbursement because he failed to comply with the notice provision of an agreement between the parties. This case presents an important…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ironforge. Com v. Paychex, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Regatos v. North Fork BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Banco del Austro, S.A. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Schroeder v. Capital One Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.