Crittendon v. State

OPINION

TAFT, Justice.

This appeal requires us to examine the scope- of a motion in arrest of judgment. Appellant, Norman Crittendon, represented himself at trial. A jury convicted him of possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution. The court found the enhancement allegations, two prior theft convictions, true and assessed punishment at 50-years confinement.

Anders Brief

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief in which she expresses her opinion that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.…