Legal Opinion

State v. Paul Guzman

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 9, 2014No. 04-13-00840-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it granted appellee’s motion to suppress. Because we conclude the trial court erred in finding the unavailability of the nurse who performed the blood draw violated appellee’s right to confront witnesses, we reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

Appellee, Paul Guzman, was charged with driving while intoxicated. The State conducted a blood draw in order to ascertain appellee’s blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”). Appellee filed a motion to suppress the results, arguing that the death of Karen…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ashby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Babloo John Williams v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022
  3. Christopher Luis Del Toro v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  4. David Rowe Ashby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  5. Ex Parte Coby Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API