State v. Crossen
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-
A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).
Exceptions overruled.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riccardi v. GarabedianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978