Legal Opinion

State v. Crossen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1975No. 6984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riccardi v. GarabedianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978