Legal Opinion

Ryno v. Snider

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1908No. 7090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered June 7, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action in ejectment brought by Harry Ryno against Anton Snider to recover possession of real estate in King county. After alleging that he had, on August 3Í, 1906, acquired the fee simple title, that he then became entitled to possession, and that the defendant, being then in *422possession, has ever since wrongfully withheld the same, the plaintiff further alleged:

“That the defendant herein claims title to the said real estate by reason of a tax title, which said tax title is void and worthless. That plaintiff’s grantors have paid to the county treasurer of King county, Washington, the officer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Investment Securities Co. v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Merritt v. CoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Moyer v. FossWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Smithson Land Co. v. BrautigamWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. BunchWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Keith v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ryno v. SniderWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Nunn v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API