Legal Opinion

Urquhart v. Urquhart

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

This is a motion to vacate and set aside service of a summons which has been served without the State and by publication, pursuant to an order of this court directing such service under subdivision 1 of section 232 of the Civil Practice Act, and which contained a recital that the plaintiff was unable to ascertain whether the moving defendant was or was not a resident of New York at the time of the application. The action was brought by the plaintiff for a declaratory judgment, to establish that he was the lawful child of the movant and his codefendant. The movant did not appear to contest the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Matter of LindgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. In Re the Estate of HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Somberg v. SombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Melis v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Scalone v. ScaloneNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hines v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Urquhart v. UrquhartNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Urquhart v. UrquhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API