Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Tulare

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 24, 2022No. 1:18-cv-01135Unknown

1Opinion

Case 1:18-cv-01135-JLT-SKO Document 62 Filed 01/24/22 Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANYKA HARRIS and BOBBY No. 1:18-cv-01135-NONE-SKO REEDOM, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF TULARE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 (Doc. No. 33) 17 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiffs Anyka Harris and Bobby Reedom (“plaintiffs”) were the mother and father, 21 respectively, of Jontell Reedom (“Jontell”). On March 12, 2018, defendants Clemente Clinton 22 (“Clinton”)…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API