Legal Opinion
N-B
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1999No. ID 3381PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3381 In re N-B-, Applicant Decided March 24, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The regulatory language at
8 C.F.R. § 3.23(b)(4)(iii)(B) (1998) contains no time or numerical limitations on aliens who wish to file a motion to reopen exclusion proceedings conducted in absentia. Nora S. Markman, Esquire, New York, New York, for applicant Before: Board En Banc: SCHMIDT, Chairman; DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA, HEILMAN, HOLMES, HURWITZ, VILLAGELIU, FILPPU, COLE, ROSEN- BERG, MATHON, GUENDELSBERGER, JONES, GRANT,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- FUENTES-CAMPOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alexander Twum v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- J-B-N- & S-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Sina Sunday v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- CRUZ-GARCIABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- MARTINEZ-MONTALVOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.