Legal Opinion

J-B-N- & S-M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3569PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

24 I&N Dec. 208

(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3569 In re J-B-N- & S-M-, Respondents Decided June 25, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Under section 101(a)(3) of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Div. B of

Pub. L. No. 109-13, 119

Stat. 302, 303, in mixed motive asylum cases, an applicant must prove that race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion was or will be at least one central reason for the claimed persecution. FOR RESPONDENTS: Elissa Steglich, Esquire, Newark, New Jersey BEFORE:…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Parussimova v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  3. Crespin-Valladares v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. Shaikh v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. C-T-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API