Legal Opinion
People v. Cetlinski
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1990No. 81176, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Boyle, J.
The issue raised in this case is whether People v Bobo, 390 Mich 355; 212 NW2d 190 (1973), precludes cross-examination regarding a prior statement, including omissions, to a police officer.1
In People v Cetlinski2 the Court of Appeals held on initial appeal that the Fifth Amendment precluded asking the defendant during cross-examination why he had not told investigating officers, in the course of prearrest voluntary conversations with them regarding the fire, that he had had a conversation with his waitress and that the wait*745ress had suggested the idea of burning…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. SchollaertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. LawtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ShollMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. McReavyMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.