Legal Opinion

In Re Estate Long

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1909No. Civ. No. 532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, disallowing the claim of an administrator against the estate of a deceased person. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

Thomas J. Crowley, administrator of the estate, had a claim against the deceased, evidenced by a promissory note, which claim, duly verified, he presented to the superior court for allowance more than five months after the time for the presentation of claims had elapsed. The claim was rejected on the ground that the time for such presentation had expired. The appeal is from this order.

Appellant contends that' the statute does not fix the time within which an executor or administrator must present his claim to the judge for allowance, and that therefore it may be presented at any time before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Melony v. WhitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Morrow v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re the Estate of HildebrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Estate of TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Rodgers' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Connell v. TackWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Elerick v. ElerickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Cribbs v. SturmanTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API